Milo Regains His Personal Power

Milo Regains His Personal Power 

Milo has stood firm against the Liberal defense and beliefs of pedophilia excuse-making. During Milo's career as a journalist, he exposed Todd Nickerson, a pedophile, who believed it was normal to be attracted to children if pedophiles did not act on their urges. Nicholas Nyberg, a self-described pedophile, and white nationalist. Luke Rosier, a London entrepreneur arrested for solicitation of online underage material. Chris Lydon, a London photographer exposed for rape, arrested and awaiting trial.

In debates, the Liberals have been unable to debate Milo with justifiable coherent facts and labeled him a racist, anti-Semitic, and white supremacist. Academia convinced its students that Milo is a violent Nazi and must be silenced, physically assault all who support Milo, and commit criminal acts of public disorder, intimidation, and criminal damage. Since Milo is Jewish, raised Catholic, gay, and dates black men how is it possible to be labeled racist, anti-Semitic, and a white supremacist? He goes against every ideal of a racist and white supremacist. 

The Liberals and the Republican establishment find him dangerous because he disagrees with them and goes against the norm. A few days ago, Milo's words were edited from a recorded interview where he agreed with the “Current Legal Age of Consent Chart for the 50 States and D.C.,” as legally correct because an individual can have sex with whomever they wish as long as that person is consenting and they are the same age or older. In a newly created defamation video, his edited words were used to knowingly falsify Milo's true words and opinions by which many believed he approved and encouraged the criminal acts of pedophilia and child abuse. Sadly, individuals became fixated on the number 13 and its apparent implication that he advocated for sex between 13-year-olds. This video failed to include his said words that consent, as all, but true and oppressive in the affirmative consent on college campuses. Instead, they placed his words "13-year-olds" before the statement, and therefore, read that Milo consented for 13-year-olds was arbitrary and oppressive (Yiannopoulos, I Was An Abuse Victim. Laughter is How I Cope, 2017). 

Milo agrees that several of his earlier and current videos were worded badly and a cause for frustration among the Republican establishment, and if possible he would rephrase those words, as to not lead to confusion. However, in most cases, his only regret is that he failed to anger more people by his offensive or outrageous comments. When Milo spoke of relationships between older men and younger men he used the word "boys." At the time, it hadn't occurred to him that he used the word "boys" in the video. He understands that most heterosexuals are not necessarily familiar with this type terminology used in the gay community and promises to be extra mindful of his use of terminology. In the gay community, the words "boy" and "girl" are used to meaning a consenting gay adult, or passive partner gets to be noticed (Yiannopoulos, I Was An Abuse Victim. Laughter is How I Cope, 2017). Milo shared his personal experience regarding his first long-term gay relationship that took place when he was 17 and his then partner 29, lasting a decade. Even though his relationship was not abusive, he has come to find it revolting because he is a reasonable person. Milo continued to expressed that this is not uncommon for gay 17-year-olds to become involved with other gay people 10 years their senior because it is an escape. Especially when they come from an abusive homes or problems with their parents. The older gay partner may care for the younger gay partner financially and emotionally (Yiannopoulos, I Was An Abuse Victim. Laughter is How I Cope, 2017).

Milo pushes the boundaries of acceptable humor, but in this case, he has come to realize that many journalists of a different generation become horrified by his jokes and consider it offensive. Milo does not regret his humor but regrets badly use of verbiage. He apologizes for his earlier videos, where he used terrible verbiage because it enabled his detractors and critics to create an illusion of damaging material against him for the basis of defamation. Milo gives no excuses for his actions because realizes his role in the mistakes he has made. For these mistakes, he temporarily gave his power away to those he exposes each day. This situation failed to ruin his life because he took responsibility for his actions, regained his power, and understands how others became confused. He continues with his joyous humor which the liberals have no understanding.

Works Cited

Yiannopoulos, M. (2015, September 21). Here's Why the Progressive Left Keeps Sticking Up For Pedophiles. p. 1.

Yiannopoulos, M. (2015, September 11). Leading Gamergate Critic Sarah Nyberg Claimed to be a Pedophile. Apologized for White Nationalism, p. 1.

Yiannopoulos, M. (2015, September 30). Todd Nickerson Continues Crusade at Salon: . I'm a Pedophile, But Breitbart Is The Monster, p. 1.

Yiannopoulos, M. (2016, December 5). Milo Obliterates Student Who Called Him A "White Supremacist". Retrieved from YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxL_bf7wetE

Yiannopoulos, M. (2017, February 20). I Was An Abuse Victim. Laughter is How I Cope. Retrieved from You Tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osFtCcpFrXI&index=2&list=LLW6igTPwZ92G2anbYxY7KLA

Yiannopoulos, M. (2017, February 1). Milo Addresses the UC Berkeley Riots. Retrieved from YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-sX5JLwidE

Yiannopoulos, M. (2017, January 26). Milo: White Nationalism Is Not the Answer. Retrieved from YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywmd8kR-AmI

Will You Hold Your Personal Power Despite Mass Hysteria?

 Will You Hold Your Personal Power Despite the Mass Hysteria?

I continue to meet my clients where they are in the moment. Will you hold onto your personal power, abundance, and unlimited potential despite the mass hysteria? I will clarify the hysteria created by the Left from a recent episode of Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO). 

Let’s begin with the definition of hysteria: It is a political behavior exhibiting an overwhelming and unmanageable fear or emotional excess. A psychoneurosis marked by emotional excitability and disturbances of the psychogenic, sensory, vasomotor, and visceral functions. For example, a few of the children began to scream, and soon they were all caught up in the hysteria. The spreading of the disease caused mass hysteria in the village. It is a wartime hysteria led to many unfair accusations of treachery. (hysteria, February 15, 2017).

The Left is desperate to obtain political power and control that they created a mass hysteria against those opposing them. The Left and its devoted news media believe they will win their political agenda through the deceptive deterrent that the Right and any opposition wants to seize political control. The Left and its co-conspirators have revealed their political plan by accusing its opposition of their agenda. Thus far, the Left and its collaborators label the opposition as racists, sexists, and Nazi to discredit the opposition’s principals. When the Left and its media encounter disagreeing ideas, they label the person or groups as “Racists or sexists” as justification for an automatic rejection to the opposing ideas. When any person speaks against the Islamic indoctrination they are automatically labeled “Racists.” This Leftist treatment is an attempt to defeat by avoidance rather than allowing the opposition to define their position or argument. It doesn’t matter if you support President Trump or not, if you disagree, refuse to say that President Trump is the “New Hitler” or ask for substantiated proof to make a compelling argument, you are labeled a “Trump Supporter, Trump Defender, or Nazi.” The Left considers your demand as a Conservative position and this opposition will be berated. The Left will avoid all rationalization in regards to their erroneous ideas because they are incapable of making compelling arguments. Moreover, the Left has convinced itself it is winning because their creation of mass hysteria, labeling and name calling, criminal acts of physical assaults won the Democrats the Court Order to stop the Temporary Immigration Halt. As well as, successful attempts to hinder Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos’s confirmation. (Maher, 2017). 

(February 15, 2017). Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hysteria

Jefferies, P. M. (2017, February 10). Piers Morgan & Jim Jefferies: The Lesser of Two Evils. (B. Maher, Interviewer)

Life is About Focus and the Way You Direct Your Energy

Life is About Focus and the Way You Direct Your Energy

As a mentor, I have been able to meet my clients where they are in the moment. As of late, my clients have shared their upsets and hopelessness by the riots that have not only inflicted our nation but the world. They cannot comprehend how our young adults accept this ideology and act in the mayhem. They question how our elected officials allow this to happen. How the media makes excuses to encourage the violence? 

The difference between us, and the fascist and social justice warriors is that we are not possessed with the notions that the world is out to get us, our ideas are the only solutions, and those who disagree with us are the enemy. We understand that making bad choices and acts of self-destruction will not satisfy one’s life. We practice self-control because we have free will, personal choice, and responsibility. We have a moral conduct, self-worth, and self-actualization that helps us reach our full potential. Happiness is earned by the way we live our lives by making healthy decisions. 

When we decide to take back our power this is when we stop seeing ourselves as a victim, acknowledge our part in the situation, and begin the process of breaking free from it by shifting our mindset. Once our mindset shifts, our attitude changes, and our actions reflect our change. We realize that threats, taunts, and insults only have meaning if we allow it. Once we accept our responsibility in the role we played we are free with a sense of control. We understand that it wasn’t our fault, but we allowed it to happen, and that made us co-conspirators. Since we allowed it to happen, we can stop allowing it to continue by not allowing it to continue. 

Empowerment is constantly exchanging from one hand to another, but it’s our responsibility to hold on to it. When we give our personal power away the other will refuse to return it. For many, the belief that they are powerless stops them from taking back their power. In fact, empowerment isn’t given to us because it belongs to us, but we must take it back and when we take it back, we regain control of our lives and self-esteem. Our personal power is valuable and is to be respected and safeguarded. We have free-will because we are responsible for our acts and actions. We are responsible how we control our lives. We are responsible to not control or abuse another person. We are responsible that we do not allow ourselves to become desensitized to the injustices surrounding our communities, cities, state, nation, and the world because it affects us in our personal lives, our home, and family. 

 

Coincidence would have it, I found out that my city officials would vote whether to become a Sanctuary City. I immediately wrote a letter to my Governor and the city officials. I expressed my opposition to this senseless vote and I would not accept a “Sanctuary City” decision. No single group or person has been given the intelligence to solve the world’s problems. Once the Pandora’s box is opened by a vote for “Sanctuary City” our right to disagree does not give us the right to destroy our city or communities or silence the people. Law-abiding people would publicly oppose the Sanctuary City. Crime would escalate and we would not know, who walks our streets to identify or make a connection to any type offenses. As a direct result, our first amendment would be jeopardized by the violent rioters, who have plagued our nation with brutal physical harm and destruction. The media would encourage the rioters. Our young adults brainwashed to fight because we are the enemy, who disagrees. Since we are a “right to carry state,” gun owners would rise and protect themselves. Law enforcement would stand down because they no longer have lawful authority. As American citizens, we are responsible for acting when protecting our Constitutional Rights as law abiding. As city residents, we would act on responsibility for safety. The federal government would enforce all federal laws to regain control of our city because the city withheld responsibility to safeguard its residents. 

Food for thought, happiness is earned by making healthy decisions. Threats, taunts, and insults only have meaning if we allow it. No group or person has the intellect to solve the world’s problems.We are responsible how we control our lives.

Political Differences Between the Left and Right

For most Americans, we our level of anxiety rises at the thought of turning on the TV, internet or radio because our nation’s turn of events which destroys our sense of safety. This negativity affects all areas of our lives by draining our desire to improve and achieve what we want out of life. The left expects ill-tempered, disobedience, and apprehensive behaviors for the excitement to spew weakness, as a strength of character. They complain how easily offended they have become and a need for safe spaces by committing criminal acts against society.
  
Weakness is not strength. The strength of mind is a strength. The strength of character is the ability to deal with negative issues that come into our daily lives.                                               

People on the left see the world as a conducive conduct of anti-social behavior between personal values and criminal behaviors, such as the craving to engross in thrill seeking criminal acts.  This narcissistic culture manipulates and bullies the world by its worship and fixation that insanity is sanity. This culture accuses the right of acting unsympathetic and inhuman because they are not eager to contribute to irrational behaviors. The right understands that making bad life choices and self -destructive act will not satisfy one’s life. They consistently practice self-control because of the beliefs in free will, personal choice, responsibility, conscientiousness, and protective factors. The Right attains a strong work ethic and moral conduct to reach for their potential, self-worth, and self-actualization. Happiness is earned by the way one lives their life by making better decisions and better life choices.

Whereas liberals believe life factors choose one’s choices in time, situation, and geographical settings. They dislike and dismiss social norms and push the boundaries by the victim ideology that circumstances have robbed them of their goals creating resentment and entitlement. They view the world as an environmental, racist, and oppressive. They dwell on hopeless, misfortune and adversity. For this reason, they justify their acts of criminality by rejecting society’s social norms by blaming the government, denial of one’s actions, and power control tendency.

There are two types of criminality (Wright, et al., 2016)

1.       Impulsive criminals are opportunists such as theft, and grand theft auto.

2.       Dark triad personality consists of four traits: narcissists, Machiavellians, psychopaths, everyday sadists, who enjoys violence. These traits set them apart for their lack of emotions and callous behavior. They have no regard for others and will use people as pawns in their own game, as a violent tool for retaliation or pleasure. In close examination, this theoretical idea uncovers it’s beginning to children with conduct disorders, and within this group of adolescents there is a smaller group with a dangerous trait in callousness and unemotional.  They are manipulative, physically violent, and abusive treatment toward others. 

 
Academia has excluded biological studies of behavior for the rational of good intent to keep out Nazism. In truth, it is a deceit to deny their political intent. Taking this into consideration, 1960s war rioters make up most social science academia, who lean toward liberalism. As such, they are teaching our children the parallel activities of today’s rioters, who emulate the 1960s rioter criminal behaviors. For example, execution of police officers, domestic bombings, riots, assaults, and public destruction.  The left scholars, media, and leaders glorify political violence for their own purpose by excusing the perpetrator’s acts and idolization of Mao, Che Guevera, and Castro. They continue to demonize the right because they consider the right as malevolent (Wright, et al., 2016). Therefore, the right is the enemy and the left will increasingly justify their behavior my means of violence. 

Reference

Wright, J. P., Morgan, M. A., Almeida, P. R., Almosaed, N. F., Moghrabi, S. S., & Bashatah, F. (2016). Malevolent Forces: Self-Control, the Dark Triad, and Crime. SAGE.